|
|
|
0 registered members (),
38,055
guests |
|
Wall Street Journal article
#41216
10/24/07 09:28 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 855
xrvlcruiser
OP
cruiser
|
OP
cruiser
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 855 |
|
|
|
Re: Wall Street Journal article
#41217
10/24/07 10:18 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,646
ChatKat...
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,646 |
Peggy,
We saw that this morning too. Yes, it's scary. My friends husband is an ER MD. and he works about twice a year on Holland America through an agency that only uses US Md's. Makes me wonder if we needed any medical attention that we felt was serious, if we disagreed with the ship MD, what we would do. It's not like you can just get off in the middle of the Atlantic for a 2nd opinion.
VOYAGER: MC to FLL 11/07 MC/Dover 6/06 MARINER: BCN / Ven 10/11 Alaska 2001|2006 Panama Canal 2003 NAV Caribbean 11/06 Bermuda|New Eng/Canada 6/04 PG 5/05 OCEANIA Nautica |Ist/Athens 6/07 Regatta|Baltics 6/08 Riviera 2013 Crossing -Istanbul to Miami
|
|
|
Re: Wall Street Journal article
#41218
10/24/07 01:35 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,257
kirky5
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,257 |
This does not surprise me at all. Things like doctors, the gift shops, and many personnel are not employees of the cruise line. They are more like "vendors". It is unfortunate that medical care is taken so lightly on cruise ships, but realistically, they are not hospitals or emergency rooms,just consultants. Lynn
|
|
|
Re: Wall Street Journal article
#41219
10/24/07 01:47 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,370
Marc
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,370 |
Sounds like we are hearing a one sided story regarding Navigator. For a judge to make the guy pay Carlson's legal costs seems to indicate that the suit was frivolous.
No complaints from me regarding the doctors. We have only used their services twice and both times was fine.
|
|
|
Re: Wall Street Journal article
#41220
10/24/07 02:08 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,646
ChatKat...
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,646 |
Marc,
I do remember the good care your MIL got in Bermuda. And I think about Betty/Greywolf's experience - you could not ask for more.
VOYAGER: MC to FLL 11/07 MC/Dover 6/06 MARINER: BCN / Ven 10/11 Alaska 2001|2006 Panama Canal 2003 NAV Caribbean 11/06 Bermuda|New Eng/Canada 6/04 PG 5/05 OCEANIA Nautica |Ist/Athens 6/07 Regatta|Baltics 6/08 Riviera 2013 Crossing -Istanbul to Miami
|
|
|
Re: Wall Street Journal article
#41221
10/24/07 07:16 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 637
Tom G
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 637 |
I think the debate is not so much over the quality of medical care on ships, but the lack of recourse if you are the rare victim of malpractice.
In the US you still have the right to sue. But it seems that if the malpractice occurs on a ship, you don't. Tom.
|
|
|
Re: Wall Street Journal article
#41222
10/28/07 05:16 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 281
judy&john
cruiser
|
cruiser
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 281 |
I work in a very busy ER in Las Vegas and without the proper testing equiptment (cat scan, ultra sound, radiology) doctors can only do so much. Everyone that comes in with a blow to the head gets a cat scan to see if there is a bleed. The ship's docotr should just stabalize and send to the nearest ER or trauma center. Basically, they have just a small clinic on board like a quick care or urgent care. There are always doctors and nurses and pharmacists on board as passengers if needed. It is up to the ship's doctor to ask for assistance. The man that had the heart attack case is inexcusable. They must of run an EKG or two. He should of been taken off the ship and had a full cardiac work-up in a real hospital. That doctor should take the responsibility. I do think that ship's doctors should all be trained ER docs and not some retired country doctor. There definitely should be an accredidation for ship doctors to pass some kind of an international exam. And they should have continuing education to get re-certified every few years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|