I just finished reading a "review" of the Queen Mary 2 Maiden Voyage and am curious. The guy sat at my dinner table for 14 nights, and did nothing but whine and grouse about everything, saw nothing positive about any part of the trip and his "review" shows it. I, however, had a grand time. Sure there were some negative parts, but it WAS a maiden voyage, and the positives FAR outweighed the negatives. But it does make one think about the value of reviews. If I hadn't seen the same conditions at the same time and eaten at the same venues, I would assume he had legitimate complaints, where I know he doesn't.
But does it go the other way, too? Is EVERYTHING rosy? Was Everyone on board perfect?
Do I dare post a review of the same trip next to his and rebutt his? <img border="0" alt="[Hammer]" title="" src="graemlins/hammer.gif" /> (Probably not - he's not worth the effort)
Sorry - just had to vent a little <img border="0" alt="[bang]" title="" src="graemlins/banghead.gif" />