Richard--

I really don't understand where you are coming from and why you feel the way you do.

Why do you assume that 100% of the fare increase is due to all inclusive? If it really was the case, I could understand, at least in part, your sense of betrayal. But clearly, this is logically not the case. Wasn't there fare increases from 2004 to 2005 w/o all inclusive being a factor?

Sure, a PORTION of the fare increases is due to going all-inclusive. I'm sure that Radisson was telling you the truth about the costs. But they didn't say "Richard, independent of whatever increases in our other costs or whatever business strategies we decide on in the future, in the year we decide to go all inclusive, we will only keep our fare increase to $15 a day".

To feel bad because you represented that the cost of going all-inclusive would be "x" and now OVERALL fares will be "y" in 2007 is just simply unwarranted in my opinion.

Regards,
Bill